A Survey of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networks
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, yet the tools available for explaining their predictions lag behind those for standard deep networks. This survey organizes the growing landscape of GNN explainability methods along three axes — instance-level versus model-level, perturbation-based versus gradient-based, and faithfulness versus plausibility — and evaluates each family against a consistent set of faithfulness benchmarks.
We find that many popular attribution methods produce explanations that are locally plausible but fail faithfulness tests under systematic perturbation, and we outline a research agenda for methods that are explainable by construction rather than by post-hoc approximation.
Key contributions
- A unifying taxonomy spanning over 40 GNN explainability methods.
- A faithfulness benchmark suite applicable across explanation families.
- An analysis showing common attribution methods often fail faithfulness checks despite appearing plausible.
On this page
Authors
Cite this paper
Okafor, T. & Bibhar, A. (2025). A Survey of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networks. ACM Computing Surveys.
@article{okafor2025a,
title = {A Survey of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networks},
author = {Okafor, Tunde and Bibhar, Abhiraj},
journal = {ACM Computing Surveys},
year = {2025}
}